Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2024
Keywords
Corporate Law, Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, European Commission, ESG, Delaware, Extraterritoriality, Caremark, International Law, Shareholder Suits, Brussels Effect
Abstract
This essay explores possible shareholder claims in the United States that may arise if and when member states of the European Union implement the proposed Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence. As a doctrinal matter, legal compliance obligations for corporations incorporated in Delaware extend beyond the borders of the United States. Under Delaware law, shareholders can bring viable fiduciary suits against directors and officers when corporations violate applicable “positive law.” This jurisprudence, principally aimed at ascertaining whether directors and officers betrayed shareholders by engaging in or facilitating lawbreaking, is not limited to complying with American law. As Delaware corporations expand their operations globally, their compliance obligations necessarily include sources of non-American law, including the laws of European nations. Interestingly, the Directive may require American corporations to comply with international treaties that the political branches of the United States have not incorporated as binding sources of domestic law. While exploring scenarios where shareholder claims may be viable, this essay also highlights several limiting principles that may constrain the Directive from opening the flood gate to shareholder suits in the United States.
Publication Citation
35 European Business Law Review 367 (2024)
Disciplines
Business Organizations Law | European Law | International Law | Law
Digital Commons Citation
Moon, William J., "The Brussels Effect and the Extraterritoriality of Delaware Corporate Law" (2024). Faculty Scholarship. 1680.
https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/1680