Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2017
Keywords
ADR, empirical, small claims, dispute resolution
Abstract
This study compares the experience of small claims litigants who use alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) to those who proceeded to trial without ADR. ADR had significant immediate and long-term benefits, including improved party attitudes toward and relationship with each other, greater sense of empowerment and voice, increases in parties taking responsibility for the dispute, and increases in party satisfaction with the judiciary. Cases that settled in ADR also were less likely to return to court for an enforcement action within the next year.
Publication Citation
34 Conflict Resolution Quarterly (2017)
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law
Digital Commons Citation
Charkoudian, Lorig; Eisenberg, Deborah Thompson; and Walter, Jamie, "What Difference Does ADR Make? Comparison of ADR and Trial Outcomes in Small Claims Court" (2017). Faculty Scholarship. 1585.
https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/1585
Comments
Official version available at DOI: 10.1002/crq.21197