Endnotes is the online companion to the Maryland Law Review. It is intended to facilitate a more robust discussion of our print articles and quickly disseminate commentary on important judicial decisions, legal policy issues, and legislative developments. This online publication features response pieces to our print articles, non-traditional law review articles, and student pieces.
Endnotes pieces are published on a rolling basis and will undergo an expedited publication schedule. All pieces are edited by the Maryland Law Review staff. We prefer response pieces and non-traditional law review articles that are 5,000 words or less (inclusive of footnotes) and lightly footnoted, but longer pieces will be published in exceptional cases. All footnotes should conform to the 19th edition of The Bluebook.
Endnotes pieces should be cited as follows: Author, Title, [Volume] MD. L. REV. ENDNOTES [Page] (Year), [PDF URL].
We invite professors, researchers, judges, practitioners, and students to submit pieces for Endnotes publication. To submit a piece, please see Endnotes Submissions.
Articles from Volume 76
The Armstrong Evolution, Michael Pappas
Response to The Influence of Exile: Three Stories, Bill Quigley
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, and David J. Maher
Utah v. Strieff: The Gratuitous Expansion of the Attenuation Doctrine, Courtney Watkins
Articles from Volume 75
Ocasio v. United States: Why the Hobbs Act Punishes Co-conspirator Extortion, Joshua T. Carback
Reflections on “Innovations in Family Dispute Resolution”, Deborah Thompson Eisenberg
Moving Family Dispute Resolution from the Court System to the Community, Jane C. Murphy and Jana B. Singer
Articles from Volume 74
"The Hindrance of a Law Degree": Justice Kagan on Law and Experience, Laura Krugman Ray
Articles from Volume 73
Articles from Volume 72
Articles from Volume 71
Not Everyone Works for Biglaw: a Response to Neil J. Dilloff, Lawrence Friedman and Louis Schulze
Personal Jurisdiction and Joinder in Mass Copyright Troll Litigation, Jason R. LaFond
Connick v. Thompson: Unclear Motives Behind a Misguided Result, Claude Nicolas
Reimagining International Water Law, Tim Stephens
Articles from Volume 70
Vogue Juridique & the Theory Choice Problem in the Debate over Copyright Protection for Fashion Designs, Michael G. Bennett, Nick Buell, Jason Cetel, and C. C. Perry
Articles from Volume 69
Articles from Volume 68
United States v. Benkahla: Illustrating the Need for Reform - the Fourth Circuit's Unprecedented Application of the United States Sentencing Guideline Terrorism Enhancement to an Obstruction of Justice Conviction, Steven A. Book
Theories of Discrimination & Gay Marriage, Adam Farra
Storetrax.com, Inc. v. Gurland: Keep Trax of your Board of Directors, James R. Hart III