Smith v. Doe: Judicial Deference Towards the Legislative Intent Behind a Broad, Punitive Civil Law Betrays the Core Principles of the Ex Post Facto Clause

Authors

Dana L. McDonald

Volume Number

63

Issue Number

2

Recommended Citation

Dana L. McDonald, Smith v. Doe: Judicial Deference Towards the Legislative Intent Behind a Broad, Punitive Civil Law Betrays the Core Principles of the Ex Post Facto Clause, 63 Md. L. Rev. 369 (2004)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol63/iss2/6