Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2007

Comments

This is one of four papers that grew out of a faculty workshop on the Hamdan decision held at the University of Maryland School of Law on September 21, 2006.

Abstract

In this Essay, I would like to focus on what I call the two great “silences” of the majority opinion in the Hamdan case and also touch upon two peculiarities in the majority opinion and in the concurring opinion of Justice Kennedy.

Recommended Citation

66 Maryland Law Review 772 (2007).

hamdan quartet symposium 2006.pdf (404 kB)
Four essays that grew out of a faculty workshop on the Hamdan decision held at the University of Maryland School of Law on September 21, 2006.

Share

COinS