Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2022
Keywords
nineteenth amendment, enfranchise, voting rights, suffrage, constitutional construction, fifteenth amendment, equal protection, due process, vote suppression
Abstract
One hundred years after the woman suffrage amendment became part of the United States Constitution, a federal court has held—for the first time—that a plaintiff must establish intentional discrimination to prevail on a direct constitutional claim under the Nineteenth Amendment. In adopting that threshold standard, the court simply reasoned by strict textual analogy to the Fifteenth Amendment and asserted that “there is no reason to read the Nineteenth Amendment differently from the Fifteenth Amendment.” This paper’s thesis is that, to the contrary, the Nineteenth Amendment is deserving of judicial analysis independent of the Fifteenth Amendment because it has a distinct constitutional history and meaning. The unique historical context preceding and following the Nineteenth’s ratification militates for courts to adopt a holistic interpretative approach when considering a Nineteenth Amendment claim. Such an approach has both expressive and doctrinal implications, providing support for courts to adopt disparate impact, rather than intentional discrimination or discriminatory purpose, as a threshold standard for such claims. Reasoning beyond the text—from legislative intent, purposes, structure, and institutional relationships—could restore the lost constitutional history around the Nineteenth Amendment, making it a more potent tool to address gendered voter suppression today, especially for women of color. This paper provides a framework for judges willing to move away from rigid textual analogy toward a more holistic constitutional interpretation when evaluating a constitutional claim under the amendment.
Publication Citation
20 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 91 (2022)
Disciplines
Civil Rights and Discrimination | Constitutional Law | Election Law | Fourteenth Amendment | Law | Law and Gender | Legal History
Digital Commons Citation
Monopoli, Paula A., "Gender, Voting Rights, and the Nineteenth Amendment" (2022). Faculty Scholarship. 1657.
https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/1657
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Election Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Legal History Commons