Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2014
Abstract
Intergenerational justice does not require increased government regulation of reproductive technologies in the United States. Arguments tarring reproductive technologies as unnatural or immoral fail to withstand close scrutiny, and moreover ignore competing moral concerns like the liberty and equality of people to form families in different ways, as well as the interests of children born via assisted reproduction in having their families recognized just as coitally conceived children’s families are recognized. Embryo markets, in contrast, might present different challenges, requiring a separate analysis of their potential impact on intergenerational justice.
Publication Citation
8 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 271 (2014).
Disciplines
Family Law | Human Rights Law
Digital Commons Citation
8 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 271 (2014).