Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2007
Keywords
health, boutique medicine, concierge care, retainer care, Medicare, balance billing, insurance, regulation, taxation, tiering, inequality, consumer-directed health care
Abstract
Retainer care arrangements allow patients to pay a fee directly to a physician's office in order to obtain special access to care. Practices usually convert to retainer status by concentrating their attention on a small panel and dropping the majority of their patients. Proponents call retainer care a triumph of consumer-directed health care; opponents deride it as boutique medicine. Both sides are deploying a variety of legal tactics in order to attain their goals.
After surveying these conflicts, this article clarifies what is at stake by analyzing the three key features of retainer care: preventive care, queue-jumping, and amenity-bundling. Most commendably, retainer physicians are aggressively counseling their patients on how to avoid getting ill. More questionably, they are trading faster access to better health care for cash. Most troublingly, they are bundling medical care with unrelated amenity services.
Each of these faces of concierge care deserves a different legal response. This article develops a normative framework for tailored intervention. Regulators have taken some promising steps toward mitigating the worst aspects of retainer care conversions. However, taxation may be the only approach sufficiently targeted to reduce incentives for queue-jumping and amenity-bundling while promoting innovation in preventive care.
Publication Citation
7 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 39 (2007).
Disciplines
Health Law and Policy | Tax Law
Digital Commons Citation
7 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 39 (2007).