Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Winter 2013

Keywords

Chesapeake Bay Program, restoration, water quality

Abstract

This Article opens with an analysis of why the Chesapeake Bay Program will repeat its past failures unless a reliable mechanism for ensuring accountability is created. It then explains how the independent evaluator should be constructed to make possible the overall success of Bay restoration. Finally, it closes with a rebuttal of the arguments in favor of self--auditing and against independent review.

Journal

4 Journal of Energy & Environmental Law 51 (2013).

Disciplines

Environmental Law

Recommended Citation

4 Journal of Energy & Environmental Law 51 (2013).

Share

COinS