Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Winter 2013
Keywords
Chesapeake Bay Program, restoration, water quality
Abstract
This Article opens with an analysis of why the Chesapeake Bay Program will repeat its past failures unless a reliable mechanism for ensuring accountability is created. It then explains how the independent evaluator should be constructed to make possible the overall success of Bay restoration. Finally, it closes with a rebuttal of the arguments in favor of self--auditing and against independent review.
Publication Citation
4 Journal of Energy & Environmental Law 51 (2013).
Disciplines
Environmental Law
Digital Commons Citation
4 Journal of Energy & Environmental Law 51 (2013).